Conformity And Nonconformity In SophoclesAntigone

The pressure to conform to society’s expectations has always been prevalent throughout history. Conformity is uncontroversial, while nonconformity is seen as detrimental to the rules that society imposes. In Antigone, the playwright, Sophocles, discusses how the choice to conform or not to conform can have an impact on one’s decisions. He utilizes the controversy surrounding the central conflict of the play, the death of Polyneices, to portray his characters’ attitudes towards conformity and nonconformity. Creon and Ismene are conformists because they believe in the absolute power of the law; whereas, Antigone is a nonconformist because she rebels against society’s rules. Creon’s conformity is apparent through the way in which he†¦show more content†¦For instance, when arguing with Antigone about Polyneices’ burial, Ismene argues that the â€Å"law is strong and they must give in to the law† (Pro. 49-50). She views the law as something that must not be violated, regardless of the circumstances. Ismene’s conformity is evident through her refusal to question the rules set in place by the authority. She is also incapable of making her own decisions. Ismene will plead guilty to Creon only if Antigone will â€Å"let [Ismene] say that she is guilty† (1.147). She is constantly seeking approval from others, and wants nothing more than to fit in with the majority. Even though Ismene was not present during Polyneices’ burial, she still conforms because of her desire to conform to the desires of others. In Noam Shpancer’s essay â€Å"You Are A Conformist, That Is, You Are Human,† Shpancer claims that conformity is inevitable for some people. He explains how â€Å"conformity is a part of our hardware, facilitating our survival and bringing us comfort.† (Shpancer). Ismene’s desire for conformity is directly related her survival. She refuses to defy the law or form her own opinions because she wants acceptance and comfort. While Ismene does not actively try to conform, it comes naturally to her, and she subconsciously adheres to the rules of society. Antigone’s disregard of the law displays her nonconformity. She is stubborn about her decision to bury Polyneices. When Ismene

Research Paper on Negotiation Free Essays

1st Log on negotiation Presented To : Dr. Hassan wageih Presented By : Mahmoud Ahmed EL-Etriby Program : MIBA 38 A Date : 3 December 2011 Mr. Essam Sharaf in Qena ,The full crime of Soft Negotiator Locals in Qena continue protesting against their governor In respect for Easter, protesters demonstrated against the new governor in silence. We will write a custom essay sample on Research Paper on Negotiation or any similar topic only for you Order Now Negotiations early today to open the railway failed. Ahram Online, Sunday 24 Apr 2011 Sharaf fails to calm crowds in Qena Egypt’s prime minister visits Qena where protesters had brought the city to a standstill following the appointment last month of a Coptic governor but his words do little to ease sectarian sentiments Ahram Online, Tuesday 3 May 2011 Egypt’s Prime Minister Essam Sharaf on Tuesday visited Qena where demonstrations erupted on 15 April following the appointment of Emad Shehata Mikhail as governor. Protesters objected to a Christian being governor for the second time in succession. Sharaf addressed an audience saying that although he had prepared a written speech he would rather speak to them â€Å"from his heart† and added that his government will pay attention to the development of Upper Egypt and appraised religious unity in Qena. While Sharaf had meant to discuss the crisis in Qena over a Christian governor, he instead stated â€Å"all of your demands will be met. The crowds, in turn, chanted its demand of a Muslim governor to which Sharaf only repeated that demands will be met. Life has returned to normal in Qena after Sharaf announced last week that he will freeze the activity of Mikhail for three months. The protesters had been further angered by Mikhail’s past as a police officer. During the peak of the protests, both the Eastern and Western highways leading into the governorate were blocked as well as train tracks, stopping trains coming from Luxor and A swan as well as Cairo. As we can see in the above headlines from Ahram Online the famous problem of Qena and the protesting of the people against the governor, the saddest part of the story is the complete failure of Mr. Essam Sharaf as a prime minister and a negotiator in handling and solving the problem. Mr. Essam in this negotiation operation was actually a full and complete example of what we called Soft Negotiator, a negotiator that is very weak in response and too much delayed because he gets panic to the threat of the protesters . Imagine that the problem initiated in the 15 th of April and he only went to the spot of the drama 3 weeks later. After he went there he continues all the sins of soft negotiator again by being so fragile and reasonable instead of being resilient and cognitive , telling them† I am speaking to you from my heart † was completely a weak and non suitable phrase to the revolution inside the protesters as he gives them too much trust actually not in its place which made him appears very weak in front of them and give them the upper hand to move the negotiation in one way direction towards their request only without discussing the fact that they have violate the law by blocking the highway to Upper Egypt and the cutting the railways as well which would give him a chance on a win-win situation in this adversative situation. Moreover he completes the sins of the soft negotiator by being so concessionary telling the crowd in public that â€Å"all your demands will be met† so what’s the role of the negotiation skills that you must have Mr. Essam in such problems if any time you face a problem or a protest you will simply choose Satisficing and settle for something much more less than you could otherwise has, which reflects clearly a self-Reinforcing Incompetence that hinders you from leveraging your power and strengths. Finally being so soft and weak in negotiations creates a cycle in which the lack of the principled negotiator skills will deprive you not only the ability to produce correct response but also the expertise necessary to know that you have produced a wrong one. Being fair only is not what we need in our prime minister , its being Fair and Firm is what we need and what make him actually a successful prime minister. It’s the Principled negotiator skills that we wanted from you at that time and every time in this era which Egypt is facing , Principled negotiators are the men of the new era , those who are not hard as nails or soft as pudding, those who have chess player mentality , who are Fair and Firm, who have strong personality and role profiles , who are always improving their power and strengths and face threats firmly with hidden strong threats that suits the adversative era and with an integrative and cognitive way that ensure the fairness rule to everyone. ******************************************************* How to cite Research Paper on Negotiation, Essays

To What extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of WW2 Essay Example For Students

To What extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of WW2 Essay To what extent was Hitler responsible for the outbreak of World War II? If you asked an average person why World War II happened, they would most likely blame it on Hitler. This accusation would be partly accurate; after all it was the Fuhrer who led the German army into Poland on September 1st 1939, officially beginning the war. But, if you take a closer look, examine the facts; you can see that numerous events lead up to this point (many of which had little to do with Hitler personally). One of the first actions, which in the long run lead to the outbreak of war, was ironically the peace Treaty of Versailles in 1919. The Treaty had many points concerning Germany, which were very harsh (they were forced to pay a huge war fee, demilitarize Rhineland, stop the production of weapons etc. ). The victorious countries thought that this would make Germany weaker, and prevent it from attacking anybody. Unfortunately, quite the opposite happened, the German people were profoundly unpleased with the outcome of World War l. The Treaty caused hatred towards everyone who agreed with it. The Wall Street Crash of 1929, one of the main reasons Hitler gained enough support to become chancellor. Why? Because the crisis spread all the way to Europe, Germany included. Hitler seemed to know a cure for all misfortunes of the Weimar Republic. He offered Jobs for the unemployed. Had the Jews and communists to blame for all the calamities, and offered to basically get rid of them. These ideas along with some amazing propaganda made Hitler chancellor in 1933. Now, that he was one of the most influential people in Germany, he could easily determine its fate. One of the things that pushed the Fuhrer to invade Poland was the fact that the League of Nations was practically powerless. This was insinuated when Italy invaded Abyssinia (both members of the League), and got away with it. Italy was a powerful country, and all the other members could do to try stopping it was threaten sanction (which wasnt even an effective threat, because there was plenty of other places from which Italy could get its resources). When everyone saw how poorly the strong members had handled this situation, they got the basic idea that the League of Nations was not as effective as it was supposed to be, and that a strong country is likely to get away with breaking some of the rules. Not only did the League seem insubstantial, ut so did Great Britain and France. They seemed to have no reaction whatsoever to Hitler repeatedly breaking more and more rules of the Treaty of Versailles. of the above actions, to some extent lead up to the outbreak of World War II. But to what extent was Hitler responsible? His actions are probably most visible at first glance. He was the man who began the war, after all. But would he have done it if Germany had been treated fairly after World War l, and its people were satisfied with the outcome? Would anybody be willing to vote for the Nazi party if there had been no crisis? From what IVe deduced, Germany would most likely not have sought revenge if it had been fairly treated. Hitler wouldnt want to gain more land, or make tne country more powerTul, as It would never nave gotten weak. I nere would never have been any November Criminals to blame. Hitlers actions, which led up to the outbreak of war, started happening after he had been appointed chancellor (became influential). But if the world depression hadnt happened, people wouldnt have had good reasons to vote for his extremist party, as they would most likely have been satisfied with the calmer centralized parties. .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 , .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 .postImageUrl , .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 , .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006:hover , .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006:visited , .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006:active { border:0!important; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006:active , .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006 .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ub3c67fad93a4168a6b1f10afc6ac2006:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Martin Luther King And Mass Media EssayIn conclusion, Hitler was responsible for the outbreak of the Second World War to a certain extent. But the most important causes (which ultimately gave him power) had happened prior to when he was appointed chancellor. Germany didnt need Hitler in person to begin the war, as it was tilting it that direction ever since 1919. He was Just the man who pushed it across the borderline. Maybe the war wouldnt have happened if Hitler had never become the Fuhrer, but The Weimar Republic would have stayed unsatisfied, and, sooner or later another person would have come along to change that.